jhalAM jazo 'nte ONPANINI 82039
( wordfinal) serious to jaz.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 937 sandhi

Because of the most-alike rule, this will replace --

c ch jh z with j

p ph bh with b

k kh gh h with g

T Th Dh S with D

t th dh s with d.

This rule, like sasaju, works always, regardless of what comes afterwards.

Examples --

anuSTubh- + su →halGyA anuSTubh anuSTub →beforepause anuSTup "stanza"

diz + kvin + su →halGyA diz →kvinpratyayasyakuH dikh dig →beforepause dik "point of the compass"

madhulih- + su →halGyA madhulih →hoDhaH madhuliDh madhuliD →beforepause madhuliT "bee"

dviS + laG tip →luGlaG adviS + tip →puganta adveS + tip → adveS + t''' →halGyA adveS adveD →beforepause adveT "he hated"

vana- + Gasi →TAGasi vanAt vanAd →beforepause vanAt

KAZIKA jhalAM jazaH AdezA bhavanti padasyAnte vartamAnAnAm. vAg atra. zvaliD atra. agnicid atra. triSTub atra. antagrahaNaM jhali ity etasya nivRtty artham. vastA. vastavyam.

You did not show any example of c ch jh z h s turning into j by this rule.

This rule will seldom work on those six letters, because rules coHkuH hoDhaH vrazcabhrasja sasaju change those letters before they can reach here. See madhulih- + su above.

In that case, why did you bother to include c ch jh z h s in your translation?

I said "seldom", not "never". This rule will change s into t when exception sipi dhAto rur vA says sasaju won't work. Also, when joining ac + halau to make rule nAjjhalau, rule coHkuH was deactivated by PMUGMYC, and then this rule changed c into j.

What's PMUGMYC?

Short for "Panini May Use God Mode, You Cannot".

jhaSas ta;thor dho 'dhaH ONPANINI 82040
t th to dh after jhaS, unless after dhA.mmmmmmmmm ^ M+ C+ 938

Examples --

budh + kta budh + dha →jhalAJjazjhazi bud- + dha → buddha- "awake"

rudh + laT tip → runadh + ti runadh + dhi →jhalAJjazjhazi runad + dhi →Natvam ruNaddhi "obstructs, stops"

gUh + kta →hoDhaH gUDh + ta gUDh + dha →STunA gUDh + Dha →DhoDhelopaH gUDha- "was hidden, was kept secret"

lih + laT tha →hoDhaH liDh + tha liDh + dha →STunA liDh + Dha →DhoDhelopaH li + Dha →Dhralope lIDha "y'all suck"

Why do we say "unless after dhA"?

After the root dhA this rule won't work. So the t th stay, and kharica works --

dhA + laT tas → dhA + zlu + tas →zlau dadhA + tas →znAbhya dadh + tas →dadhastathozca dhadh + tas →kharica dhattas "both put"

dhA + laT thas dhadh + thas ( like above ) →kharica dhatthas "you two put"

Sa;DhoH kaH si ONPANINI 82041
S Dh to k before s.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 939

The k will always trigger kric, so this rule may also be stated as --

" S + s = kS

Dh + s = kS "

Examples --

dviS + laT sip →puganta dveS + si dvek + si →kric dvekSi "you hate"

lih + sya + tip →puganta leh + sya + ti →hoDhaH leDh + sya + ti lek + sya + ti →kric lekSyati "he'll lick"

This rule will not work before laG sip, because halGyA has priority --

dviS + laG sip adveS + s''' →halGyA adveS →jhalAJjazonte adveD →beforepause adveT "you hated"

All of your examples involve affixes. Will this rule work on wordfinal Dh S?

Never. There ain't such a thing as wordfinal Dh S any longer, because two rules ago we turned all of those into D.

radAbhyAM niSThAto naH pUrvasya ca daH ONPANINI 82042
After r d, niSThA to n, and the d too.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 940

So r plus the ta of kta ktavatu makes rNa --

tRR + kta →RRta::iddhAtoH tirta- →halica tIrta- tIrna- →Natvam tIrNa- "crossed, gone beyond"

tRR + ktavatu m →RRta::iddhAtoH tirtavat- →halica tIrtavat- tIrNavat- "he crossed"

And d plus the ta of kta ktavatu makes nna --

bhid + kta bhin + kna → bhinna- "was cut, was rent asunder"

bhid + ktavatu m bhinnavat- "he cut"

vi + sad + kta vi + san + kna →kric viSanna →Natvam viSaNna →STunA viSaNNa- "depressed"

Notice that this rule does not work when there is R but no r --

smR + kta → smRta- "remembered"

See also lv-AdibhyaH below.

KAZIKA rephadakArAbhyAm uttarasya niSThAtakArasya nakAraH Adezo bhavati pUrvasya ca dakArasya. rephAntAt tAvat AstIrNam. vistIrNam. vizIrNam. nigIrNam. avagUrNam. dakArAt bhinnaH. bhinnavAn. dhinnaH. chinnavAn. radAbhyAm iti kim? kRtaH . kRtavAn. raH ityatra razrutisAm anyaM na upAdIyate, kiM tarhi, vyaJjanamAtram. rephasAmAnyanirdeze 'pi sati rephAt parA yA 'jbhaktis tadvyavadhAnAnnatvaM na bhavati. niSThA iti kim? kartA. hartA. taH iti kim? caritam. muditam. pUrvasya iti kim? parasya mA bhUt, bhinnavadbhyAm. bhinnavadbhiH. iha kRtasya apatyaM kArtiH iti vRddheH bahiraGgalakSaNAyA asiddhatvAnnatve kartavye rephasya asiddhatvam.

lv-AdibhyaH ONPANINI 82044
After luclass (t of niSThA and ktin to n).mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 941

The luclass are the roots from lUJ 09.0016 "reap" to plI 09.0039 "move". They all are puclass too. These include lU "reap", kRR "scatter, throw", vRR "choose", pRR "fill" and jyA "grow old, decay".

Examples --

lU + kta lUna- "was reaped"

kRR + kta kRR + na kIrNa- "scattereded"

pRR + kta pRR + na pUrna →Natvam pUrNa- "full"

jyA + ktavatu jInavat- "he grew old"

kRR + ktin kIrNi- f "a scattering, a throwing"

(The rule does not mention ktin, but a vArttika adds it.)

KAZIKA lUJ chedane ityetat prabhRti vRJ varaNe iti yAvat vRtkaraNena samApitA lvAdayo gRhyante. tebhyaH uttarasya niSThAtakArasya nakArAdezo bhavati. lUnaH. lUnavAn. dhUnaH. dhUnavAn. jInaH. jInavAn. RkAralvAdibhyaH ktinniSThAvadbhavati iti vaktavyam. kIrNiH. gIrNiH. zIrNiH. lUniH. pUniH.

oditaz ca ONPANINI 82045
( niSThA to n) after odit roots.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 942

For instance, the root vij 06.0009 "tremble" appears in the dhAtupATha as (o)vij(I), so this rule applies --

ud + (o)vij(I) + kta ud + (o)vij(I) + (k)na →coHkuH udvigna- "shuddering"

ud + vij + ktavatu m + su udvignavAn "he shuddered"

KAZIKA o-kAr%eto dhAtor uttarasya niSThA takArasya nakAr´Adezo bhavati. olasjI lagnaH. lagnavAn. ovijI udvignaH. udvignavAn. opyAyI vRddhau ApInaH. ApInavAn. svAdaya oditaH. SUG sUnaH. sUnavAn. dUG dUnaH. dUnavAn. dIG dInaH. dInavAn. DIG DInaH. DInavAn. dhIG dhInaH. dhInavAn. mIG mInaH. mInavAn. rIG rINaH. rINavAn. lIG lInaH. lInavAn. vrIG vrINaH. vrINavAn.

paco vaH ONPANINI 82052
After pac, ( niSThA to) v.mmmmmmmmm ^ M+ C+ 943

All examples --

pac + kta →coHkuH pak + ta pakva- "was cooked"

pac + ktavatu →coHkuH pak + tavat pakvavat- "did cook"

kvin-pratyayasya kuH ONPANINI 82062
( wordfinal) of kvin-ender to ku.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 944

kvin is a rootnoun -maker kRt affix, rarely used. Rule RtvigdadhRk says that Rtvij, diz-, prAc- and others have kvin.

z ordinarily makes D by vrazca;bhrasja and jhalAJjazonte. But this exception turns any wordfinal letter of a quinn-ender into the most-alike ku.

Examples --

diz- + su →halGyA diz dik "point of the compass, course"

diz + bhyas →svAdiSva diz (word) + bhyas digbhyaH "to / from all directions"

yuj- + su →yujerasamAse yunjs →halGyA yunj →saMyogAnta yun yuG "a joiner"

prAc + su →ugidacA prAncs →halGyA prAnc →saMyogAnta prAn prAG "eastern"

Does this rule work before bhis after the j of yuj- becomes wordfinal by svAdiSva?

It works, but uselessly so, because coHkuH four rules downriver would have made yugbhis anyway.

But whitney says that prAnc becomes prAnk (by coHkuH I guess), then n to G before k ( monus and anusvA, clearly), then loses the final -- that must be saMyogAnta, right?

Whitney is explaining how the word evolved historically -- he's not explaining how pANini rules work. By cantgoback, the rules cannot work in your order.

mo no dhAtoH ONPANINI 82064
Replace wordfinal m of a root with n.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 945

This applies to rootnoun-enders, such as prazAm- "tranquillized, pacified, unhurt" (from pra + zam + kvip, with A by anunAsikasya kvi;jhaloH kGiti).

Example with an m that becomes wordfinal because su disappears -

prazAm- + su →halGyA prazAm prazAn

Counterexample with a non- wordfinal m --

prazAm- + am → prazAmam

Examples when m is wordfinal by svAdiSva --

prazAm- + bhis prazAnbhis

prazAm- + sup' prazAnsu

And optionally --

prazAm- + sup' prazAnsu →nazca prazAntsu

KAZIKA makArantasya dhAtoH padasya nakArAdezo bhavati. prazAn pratAn. pradAn. zamitamidamAdInAM kvip, anunAsikasya kvijhaloH kGit]Iti dIrghatvam. natvasya asiddhatvAn nalopo na bhavati. maH iti kim? bhit. chit. dhAtoH iti kim? idam. kim. padasya ityeva, pratAmau. pratAmaH.

Inria declension says prazAMsu, not prazAnsu nor prazAntsu.

Bug! inria applied 83023 monusvA, but that rule can't work earlier than 82064 monodhAtoH , because of cantgoback.

sa;sajuSo ruH ONPANINI 82066
( wordfinal) s to ru.mmmmmmmmm ^ M+ C+ 946 sandhi

Always change wordfinal s into ru. Regardless of what comes next.

The ru is a special sort of r that carries label u.

Sometimes that u label has no effect at all, and it is just destroyed by tasyalopaH, like in these two examples --

gurus + brahmA guru + ru + brahmA → gururbrahmA "the teacher is like brahmA"

kapis + pazyati kapi + ru + pazyati →kharava kapiH pazyati →kupvoKkaFpauca kapiF pazyati "monkey sees"

Here the label u had no effect. When we put punar, that has a r with no label u, in front of the same word, the same rules work, and we get punar brahmA, punaF pazyati anyway. However, in other situations, that label u will have an effect on rules atoro, hazica, bhobhago and rossupi.

For instance, with a ru we get --

azvas + dravati azva + ru + dravati →hazica azvo dravati "horse runs"

azvas + adravat azva + ru + adravat →atoro azvo 'dravat "horse ran"

But those rules work differently with a r that has no label u. So we get no hazica and no atoro here --

punar dravati "runs again"

punar dravati "ran again"

The wordfinal r that does not carry label u is sort of rarity. See true r for examples.

This rule has the optional exception sipidhAtorurvA. When the option is taken, the s is not replaced by ru; instead, it becomes d by jhalAJjazonte.

What's that sajuS in the rule?

vedic thing. Ignore it.

ahan ONPANINI 82068
Replace wordfinal ahan- (with ru).mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 947

This rule only works when ahan- "day" gets word status from svAdiSva, so there are exactly four examples --

ahan + bhyAm →svAdiSva ahan ( word ) aha + ru + bhyAm →hazica ahobhyAm "within two days"

ahan + bhis → ahobhis "within days"

ahan + bhyas → ahobhyas "after days"

ahan + sup' aha + ru + su →kharava ahaHsu →vAzari ahasHsu "in days"

This rule will not work before su am luk, because of rosupi below --

ahan- + su + Agame →supodhA ahan- + luk + Agame →rosupi aharAgame "at daybreak"

When ahan- is wimpy, alloponaH works --

ahan- + Gas →alloponaH ahnas "of the day"

ro 'supi ONPANINI 82069
(Replace ahan-) with r when not before sup.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 948

Exception to rule ahan, that would have replaced ahan- with ru.

(Do not confuse this rule with rossupi "r stays before sup'".)

A nounbase is asupi "not before sup" if its sup became luk by svamorna or supodhA.

Example with svamorna --

ahan- n + su + yat →svamorna ahan + yat ahar yat "the day that..."

Example with supodhA --

ahan- + Gas + Agame →supodhA ahan + Agame ahar-Agame "at the coming of the day, at daybreak"

Shouldn't this rule have worked in tehorAtravidojanAH at bhg 8:17?

Yes, it should. Yet, because of some vArttika, the ahan- of certain compounds gets ru replacement, not r.

vasu;sraMsu;dhvaMsv;anaDuhAM daH ONPANINI 82072
Replace ( wordfinal) vasu sraMs dhvaMs anaDuh- with dmmmmmmmmm ^ M+ C+ 949

This is an exception to sasaju and hoDhaH.

Examples with vasu --

vidvas- n + su →svamorna vidvas vidvad →beforepause vidvat "that knows"

vidvas- mn + bhis vidvadbhis "by sages"

vidvas- mn + sup' vidvadsu →kharica vidvatsu "about sages"

Example with sraMs + kvip --

sraMs + kvip + su →aniditA sras + s →halGyA sras srat "whatever falls"

which may be used as a latter in the compound --

ukhAsrat mfn "fallen from the pan"

Example with anaDuh-

anaDuh- m + bhis →svAdiSva anaDuh ( word ) + bhis anaDudbhis m "by beasts of burden"

sipi dhAto rur vA ONPANINI 82074
Optionally replace with d the s of a root that is before deleted s'''.mmmmmmmmm ^ M+ C+ 950

Optional exception to sasajuSoruH.

Example --

cakAs + laG sip →luGlaG acakAs + sip → acakAs + s''' →halGyA acakAs acakAd "you shone"

as in the sentence --

acakAt tvam "you shone"

If we don't take this option, sasaju works as usual --

cakAs + laG sip →luGlaG acakAs + sip → acakAs + s''' →halGyA acakAs "you shone"

as in the sentence --

acakAs tvam "you shone"

See also dazcax below.

I sort of vaguely remember that there was another rule that changed s into t in rare situations.

Maybe that was sassyArdhadhAtuke, which turns vas + syati into vatsyati.

Please translate the rule literally.

Adding the trickles, it says --

"before sip, the replacing of the wordfinal s of a root with ru is optional".

The s of a root becomes wordfinal only when itazca and halGyA work. If we choose to not make sasaju turn that s into ru, then jhalAMjazonte turns the s into d.

daz ca x ONPANINI 82075
Optionally replace with s the d of a root that is before deleted s'''.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 951

So we may either say --

rudh- + laG sip arunadhs →halGyA arunadh →jhalAJjazonte arunad →Natvam aruNad "you obstructed"

or apply this option and say --

rudh- + laG sip arunad arunas →Natvam aruNas "you obstructed"

There is an unrelated rule that sounds the same, daz ca.

KAZIKA dakArAntasya dhAtoH padasya sipi parato ruH bhavati, dakAro vA. abhinas tvam, abhinat tvam. acchinas tvam, acchinat tvam.

What's that x in the rule?

See about the letter x in rules .

r;vor upadhAyA dIrgha:: ikaH ONPANINI 82076
lengthen wordfinal ir ur iv uv (of a root).mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 952

A rootnoun that ends in r v, when wordfinal, lengthens its nexttolast i u.

As in --

gir- + bhis →sv;AdiSva @word gir + bhis gIrbhis "with words"

gir- + su →halGyA gir gIr "speech"

gir- + sup' gIrSu "in words"

dhur- + su →halGyA dhur dhUr "yoke"

Azis- + su →halGyA Azis →sasaju Azir AzIr "hope"

KAZIKA rephavakArAntasya dhAtoH padasya upadhAyAH ikaH dIrgho bhavati. gIH. dhUH. pUH. AzIH. vakAra-grahaNam uttar%Artham. upadhAgrahaNaM kim? abibhar bhavAn. abhyAsekArasya mA bhUt. ikaH iti kim? atra eva pratyudAharaNe bhazabdAkArasya mA bhUt. dhAtoH ityeva, agniH. vAyuH. padasya ityeva, girau. giraH.

Why didn't kharava affect gIrSu?

Exception rossupi.

All of your examples end in r. Any examples with wordfinal v?

There ain't any. The iv uv are mentioned here uttarArtham, i.e., so that they trickle down to the next rule.

Which of the nounbases that end in r are rootnouns?

I'm not sure. As far as I know, all are. Don't worry, they are few and far between.

Your translation mentions i u only, but the original rule says ik. Shouldn't the original rule lengthen Ry Rv too?

It would, but no roots end in Ry Rv.

In that case, all examples have i u. Why then didn't pANini end this rule with iNaH instead of ikaH?

I'm not sure. For some reason, pANini never used iN to mean i I u U. See iN.

hali ca ONPANINI 82077
(Lengthen ir ur iv uv of a root) before consonant.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 953

In a root that ends in r v, the nexttolast i u lengthen before consonant. Even if the r v is not wordfinal.

So here ir iv lengthen before y and t --

div + laT tip → div + zyan + tip dIvyati "gambles"

vi + stRR + kta →RRta::iddhAtoH vi + stir + ta vistIrta →radAbhyAnni vistIrna →Natvam vistIrNa- "spread out"

As in --

kaz cid bhavati vistIrNo na prastAro mama kSateH "no extension can be wider than my wound"

Example with ur --

pRR + kta →udoSThya pur + kta pUr + kta →radAbhyAnni pUrna- →Natvam pUrNa- "filled, full"

As in --

kaSTamM pUrNaJM jalavyAlair vimAnamM plotR mAmakam "drat, my hovercraft is full of eels!"

Why do we say "before consonant"?

No kIr here --

kRR + za + tip →RRta::i kirati "disperses"

na bha;kur;churAm ONPANINI 82079
But not wimpy, kur, chur.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 954

Exception to previous rule. kur, chur, and wimpy ir ur iv uv won't lengthen their i u before consonant.

Example with a wimpy --

dhur "burden" is wimpy before yat'', which is a taddhita allowed by dhuro yaDDhakau

dhuraM vahati "carries a load" → dhurya- "beast of burden, porter"

Example with kur, which is the kuru that was affected by nityaGkaroteH --

kR + @hard liG tip → kuru + tip →nityaGkaroteH kur + tip → kur + yAt''' → kuryAt "he would do"

Example with chur "cut", a zaclass root --

kR + @hard liG tip churyAt "he would cut"

KAZIKA repha-va-kAr'-.Antasya bhasya kur chur ity etayoz ca dIrgho na bhavati. dhuraM vahati dhuryaH. dhuri sAdhuH dhuryaH. divyam. kur - kuryAt. chur - churyAt. rephavakArAbhyAM bhavizeSaNaM kim? pratidIvnA. pratidIvne..

adaso 'ser dAd u do maH ONPANINI 82080
If adas- has no s, d plus vowel to mu or mU.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 955

adas- loses its s before vibhakti because of tyad-AdInAmaH. After adding the vibhakti, the d will be before a vowel. Then we replace the d and the vowel with mu or mU.

We replace with mu when the vowel is short and with mU when it's long, because the most-alike rule says so.

Examples with mu replacement--

adas- m + am →tyadAdInAmaH ada- + am →amipUrvaH adam amum

adas- m + TA → ada + TA amu + TA →AGonAstriyAm amunA

Examples with mU replacement--

adas- m + zas →tyadAdInAmaH ada- + zas →prathamayo adAs →tasmAccha adAn amUn "those"

adas- m + au →tyadAdInAmaH ada- + au →nAdici adau amU "those two"

adas- mfn + bhyAm → ada- + bhyAm →supica adA + bhyAm amUbhyAm "by those two"

This rule won't affect the de of the plural, because of exception eta::Idba below.

Here is a more literal translation of this rule --

" When adas lost its s, replace what is after d with u U, and the d with m. "

See also adas- at pronoun tables .

KAZIKA adaso '-sakAr%Antasya varNasya dAt parasya uvarN´Adezo bhavati, dakArasya ca makAraH. amum, amU, amUn. amunA, amUbhyAm. bhAvyamAnena apyukAreNa savarNAnAM grahaNam iSyate iti ekamAtrikasya mAtrikaH, dvimAtrikasya dvimAtrikaH Adezo bhavati. aseH iti kim? adaH icchati adasyati. adaso 'nosra iti vaktavyam. okArarephayorapi pratiSedho yathA syAd iti. ado 'tra. adaH. tad-arthaM kecit sUtraM varNayanti, aH seH yasya so 'yam asiH, yatra sakArasya akAraH kriyate iti, tena tyadAdya-tva-vidhAne etad anyatra na bhavitavyam eva iti. adryAdeze katham? adaso 'dreH pRthaG mutvaM kecid icchanti latva-vat. kecid antyasadezasya nety eke 'serhi dRzyate. iti. yaiH aseH iti sakArasya pratiSedhaH kriyate, anantyavikAre antyasadezasya iti ca paribhASA na azrIyate, teSAm ubhayorapi mutvena bhavitavyam, amumuyaG, amumuyaJcau, amumuyaJcaH iti , yathA calIkLpyate iti latvam. ye tu paribhASAm Azrayanti teSAm antyasadezasya eva bhavitavyam, adamuyaG, adamuyaJcau, adamuyaJcaH iti. yeSaM tu tyadAdyatvaviSaya eva mutvena bhavitavyam iti darzanam teSAm atra na bhavitavyam, adadryaG, adadryaJcau, adadryaJcaH iti. dAtiti kim? alo 'ntyasya mA bhUt, amuyA. amuyoH.

eta:: Id bahuvacane ONPANINI 82081
Before plural, replace the de of adas- (with mI).mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 956

Exception to adasose. In the plural, the de of adas- turns into mI, not mU.

There are exactly five examples --

adas- m + jas →tyadAdInAmaH ada + jas →jasazzI ada + zI →AdguNaH ade amI "those"

(This amI a nonjoiner, by adasomAt.)

adas- + bhis →tyadAdInAmaH ada + bhis →bahuvacanejhalyet ade + bhis amIbhis "with those"

(Here atobhisa::ais did not work, because of the exception nedamadasorakoH.)

adas- + sup' →tyadAdInAmaH ada + su →bahuvacanejhalyet ade + su amIsu →kric amISu "in those"

adas- + Am →tyadAdInAmaH ada + Am → ada + sAm →bahuvacanejhalyet adesAm amIsAm →kric amISAm "of those"

adas- + bhyas amIbhyas "at those; from those"

See also pronoun tables .

dUrAd @dhUte ca ONPANINI 82084
When calling from afar (a sentence-final calling is optionally extralong and acute).mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 957

As in --

Agaccha bho devadattA3 "come here, devadattaaaa!"

kSiyA;''zIH;praiSeSu tiG AkAGkSam ONPANINI 82104
When meaning impoliteness blessing command, last vowel of cliffhanger verb becomes extralong and falling.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 958 extralong

A "cliffhanger" is the first of two sentences that together make one idea. Example. To express that someone else is impolite, we may say --

svayaM rathena yAti3 upAdhyAyamM padAtiGM gamayati "on chariot himself he gooooes, and makes his teacher go on foot! (rolls eyes)"

Here the first sentence is a cliffhanger.

The first sentence must have a verb at the end for this rule to work, so I translate the next two examples into Yodaese --

A blessing made of two closely related sentences --

sutAMz ca lapsISTa3 dhanaJM ca tAta "may you sons geeeet, and wealth!"

And a compound command --

kaTaGM kuru3 grAmaJM ca gaccha "a mat maaake, and go to the village!"

BTW, this lapsISTa verb is a soft bent liG, so inria will fail to parse it. It is built like this --

labh + @soft liG ta → labh + sISTa''' →jhalAJjazjhazi lab + sISTa →kharica lapsISTa

KAZIKA svaritaH iti vartate. kSiyA AcarabhedaH, AzIH prArthanAvizeSaH, zabdena vyApAraNam praiSaH, eteSu gamyamAneSu tiGantam AkAGkSaNaM yat tasya svaritaH pluto bhavati. AkAGkSati iti AkAGkSam, tiGantam uttarapadam AkAGkSati ityarthaH. kSiyAyAM tAvat svayaM rathena yAti3, upAdhyAyaM padAtiM gamayati iti. svayam odanaM ha bhuGkte3, upAdhyAyaM saktUn pAyayati. pUrvam atra tiG-antam uttarapadam AkAGkSati iti sAkAGkSaM bhavati. AziSi sutAMz ca lapsISTa3 dhanaM ca tAta. chando 'dhyeSISTa3 vyAkaraNam ca bhadra. praiSe kaTaM kuru3 grAmaM ca gaccha. yavAn lunIhi3 saktUMzca piba. AkAGkSam iti kim? dIrghaM te Ayur astu. agnIn vihara.