deriv LSK ETT STT aSTA ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE
(a अ A आ) plus (i इ I ई) makes e ए by AdguNaH
(a अ A आ) plus (u उ U ऊ) makes o ओ by AdguNaH
(a अ A आ) plus (R ऋ RR ॠ L ऌ) makes ar अर् ar अर् al अल् by AdguNaH and uraNraparaH
(a अ A आ) plus (e ए ai ऐ) makes ai ऐ by vRddhireci
(a अ A आ) plus (o ओ au औ) makes au औ by vRddhireci
(a अ A आ) plus (a अ A आ) makes I ई by akassavarN...
(i इ I ई) plus (i इ I ई) makes I ई by akassavarN...
(u उ U ऊ) plus (u उ U ऊ) makes U ऊ by akassavarN...
(R ऋ RR ॠ L ऌ) plus (R ऋ RR ॠ L ऌ) makes RR ॠ by akassavarN...
When the /ik are before a non-savarNa, they change like this, by ikoyaNaci —
i इ I ई → y य्
u उ U ऊ → v व्
R ऋ RR ॠ → r र्
L ऌ → l ल्
e ए + a अ → e ' ए ऽ by eGaHpadAnt...
o ओ + a अ → o ' ओ ऽ by eGaHpadAnt...
e ए o ओ before the other vowels, and ai ऐ au औ before all vowels, change like this —
e ए → a:: अ by ecoyavAyAvaH and lopazzAkaly...
o ओ → a:: अ by ecoyavAyAvaH and lopazzAkaly...
ai ऐ → A:: आ by ecoyavAyAvaH and lopazzAkaly...
au औ → Av आव् by ecoyavAyAvaH (no lopazzAkaly... this time)
That lopazzAkaly... is an optional rule. Does /pANini teach that we have to apply it after e ए o ओ ai ऐ but not after au औ?
No, /pANini does not teach that. Doing that is just a modern custom.
In very old texts you may sometimes hear the other options, like —
he viSNav ity abravIt हे विष्णवित्यब्रवीत्
he said "he viSNo हे विष्णो"