deriv SD cv (548) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 548 ETT STT a 3.4.81 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

liTas ta;jhayor ez;irec

लिटस्तॱझयोरेशिरेच् ONPANINI 34081

Replace /liT /ta with /ez and /liT /jha with /irec.

Examples with /liT /jha —

kR + /liT /jha
→ kR + /irec by this rule
→ **cakR- + /irec
→ !**cakrire "they did"

pac + /liT /jha
→ pac- + /irec
→ **pec- + /irec by ata::ekah...
→ !**pecire "they cooked"

vand + /liT /jha
→ vand- + /irec by this rule
→ vavand + /irec by liTidhAtor... and halAdizzeSaH
→ !**vavandire "they praised"

Examples with /liT /ta —

kR + /liT /ta
→ kR + /ez by this rule
→ **cakR- + /ez
→ cakr- + /ez by ikoyaNaci
→ !**cakre "he did (A.)"

Notice that /liT /iT' too becomes e , but by << Tita::Atman... —

kR + /liT /iT'
→ **cakR- + /iT'
→ cakR- + /e''' by << Tita::Atman...
→ cakr- + /e''' by ikoyaNaci
→ !**cakre' "I did (A.)"

pac + /liT /iT'
→ pac + /e''' by << Tita::Atman..., , this /e''' is /kit by asaMyogAll... and atideza
→ **papac- + /e'''
→ **pec- + /e''' by ata::ekah... because /e''' is /kit
→ !**pece' "I cooked (A.)", "I matured"

See also bent liT.

Why is /ez a /zit?

Because of anekAlzits.... Where it not /zit, replacing /ta with e would make te .

Why is /irec a /cit?

The /cit is always for accent, see citaH.