deriv SD cv (645) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 645 ETT STT a 7.1.4 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

ad abhyastAt अदभ्यस्तात् ONPANINI 71004

Replace jh झ् with at अत् after an /abhyasta.

Or in more words —

The /abhyasta get /ati''' /atu''' instead of the usual /anti''' /antu'''.

Exception to < jhontaH.

hu + /laT /jhi
→ **juhu- + /jhi
→ juhu + /ati''' by this rule
→ juhv + /ati''' by huznuvossArv...
→ !**juhvati "they sacrifice"

dA + /laT /jhi
→ **dadA- + /jhi
→ **dadA- + /ati'''
→ **dadati "they give"

dA + /loT /jhi
→ !**dadatu "let them give"

**dadhati "they put"

!**dadhatu "let them put"

hA + /laT /jhi → **jahati "they quit", "they lose"

So, /abhyasta means a /juhotyAdi root?

/abhyasta, when before /jhi, means either that, or one of the magnificent seven, the jakSityAday... —

jakSa~ + /laT /jhi → **jakSati "they consume"

jakSa~ + /loT /jhi → !**jakSatu "let them consume"

**jAgrati

!**jAgratu

cf the singular —

jakSa~ + /laT /tip
→ jakSa~ + iti by rudAdibhyass...
→ **jakSiti "eats"

jakSa~ + /loT /tip → !**jakSitu "let him eat"

**jAgarti

antAdezApavAdo 'yaJ jus-Adezena tu bAdhyate

**adadhus

**ajAgarus

atrApy Adezo kRte pratyayAdy udAttatvam bhavati

hole

But because of the exception sijabhyastav..., we have /jus in the /laG and other tenses —

**ajuhavus "they sacrificed"

**adadus "they gave"

**vidus "they knew / they know"

Does this rule affect /jha too?

Yes. /jha becomes /ata''' after an /abhyasta.

hu + /laG /jha → **ajuhvata "sacrificed (bent)"

Remark that /jhi becomes /ati''' only after an /abhyasta, but /jha becomes /ata''' after everything that does not end in a , be it /abhyasta or not. See examples in Atmanepad... >.

Those plural ati -enders like **dadati look like singulars. What are their singular forms?

dA + /laT /tip → **dadAti "gives"

hA + /laT /tip → **jahAti "quits"

hu + /laT /tip → **juhoti "sacrifices"

hu + /laT /ta → **juhute "sacrifices" CHECK