deriv LSK ETT STT aSTA ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

@some bent loT

How is AsyatAm आस्यताम् formed?

Like **dIyatAm दीयताम् —

As आस् + nothingshowing /loT /ta
→ As आस् + /yak + /ta
→ As आस् + /yak + /te''' by Tita::Atman...
→ As आस् + /yak + /tAm'''' by AmetaH
→ !**AsyatAm आस्यताम् "let sitting take place"

Unlike **dIyatAm दीयताम्, this **AsyatAm आस्यताम् always has /ta, because As आस् is objectless.

Wait, now that I think of it, how come Tita::Atman... works here? Shouldn't loTolaGvat forbid the /te''' change?

No, it shouldn't. If rule loTolaGvat worked here, rule AmetaH would be left with nothing to chew.

dviS द्विष्+ /loT /iT'
→ dveS द्वेष् + /ai'''
!**dveSai द्वेषै "lemme hate"

tan तन् + /laT
→ tan तन् + /zap + /laT by kartarizap
→ tan तन् + /u + /laT by tanAdikRJbhy...
→ !**tanu- तनुॱ + /laT

**tanu- तनुॱ + /loT /mahi
→ tanu तनु + mahe महे by Tita::Atman...
→ tanu तनु + mahai महै by eta::ai
→ tanu तनु + ( /AT + mahaip महैप् ) by ADuttamasy...
→ tano तनो + Amahaip आमहैप् by sArvadhAtuk...
→ tanav तनव् + Amahai आमहै by ecoyavAyAvaH
→ !**tanavAmahai तनवामहै

!**dveSAmahai द्वेषामहै, like **dveSAvahai द्वेषावहै

oM saha nAv avatu ओं सह नाववतु
saha nau bhunaktu सह नौ भुनक्तु
saha vIryam karavAvahai सह वीर्यम्करवावहै
tejasvi nAv-adhItam astu तेजस्वि नावधीतमस्तु
mA vidviSAvahai मा विद्विषावहै
oM zAnti zAnti zAnti ओं शान्ति शान्ति शान्ति

The /pitness makes the substitutes of /vas /mas cause /guNa by gbH (the substitutes of /mip already did that, by sthAnivadAd...).

dviS द्विष् + /loT /mip
→ dviS द्विष् + nip निप् by merniH
→ dviS द्विष् + Anip आनिप् by ADuttamasy...
→ dveSANi द्वेषाणि "let me hate"

karu करु + /loT /mip
→ **karavANi करवाणि "let me do"

karu करु + /loT /vas
→ karavAva करवाव "let's do"

karu करु + /loT /mas
→ karavAma करवाम "let's do"