chunk 37: 71027 yuSmad and asmad chunk 37: 71027 yuSmad and asmad
71027
71028
71029
71030 Fourth
71031 Fifth to
71032
71033
71034
71035 Optionally
71036 After
71037
71052
71053
71054
71055 after sixlike and
71058
71059 Before
71060
71070
71071 Uncompounded
71072 nonfunny gets
71073
71074 Before
71075
^ 
There are only two examples --
yuSmad- + Gas 
asmad- + Gas
Back to
^ Examples with Ge --
yuSmad- + Ge →
asmad- + Ge 
with first --
yuSmad- + su
asmad- + su
with second --
yuSmad- + am
asmad- + am
Back to
^ Exception to Geprathama above.
Only examples --
yuSmad- + zas →
asmad- + zas
Back to
^ Only examples:
yuSmad- +
asmad- +
Back to
^ Only examples --
yuSmad- +
asmad- +
As in --
These
yuSmad- +
As in --
Notice that the earlier
Back to
^ Only examples --
yuSmad- +
asmad- +
As in --
These
Back to
^ This rule can be reworded as:
" yuSmad- plus Am makes
Only examples --
yuSmad- + Am →
asmad- + Am →
Back to
^ 
Example --
^ According to loTca, the loT may have many meanings, one of which is "wish", that is, blessing or curse --
When loT means a wish, this rule allows replacing the
As in --
The
brU + loT sip →
brU + loT tip →
You might have noticed two oddities here. First, the
^ In other words, this rule is saying --
According to this rule,
This
See also
^ The affix
The ktvA-enders, being verb replacers, can only be in a compound when rules gatizca ff allow it. In all the following the ktvA word is in composition after a preverb, but we also get lyap in
Examples after a root that carries a preverb --
pra + pra +
The
ava + ava +
Counterexamples after a root with no preverb --
^ 
Getting
Examples --
tad- mn + Am →
^ Only example --
tri- + Am
As in --
^ So Am turns into nAm after most vowels.
(1) Example after Ap --
(2) Examples after
(3) Examples after short
This rule works after most vowels. The vowels that do not turn Am into nAm are all seldom found, namely --
(A) the ec (only in nounbases go-
(B) the rootnouns that end in
So we say
^ So we replace Am with nAm after --
catur- + Am
and of course after SaS-, which is clearly a sixlike --
SaS- + Am
^ An idit root has label
The label
As it gets num no matter what, it is listed as
^ 
Example --
The
So this rule is why we have
Examples of
^ 
The roots
and
get num before affixes that start with a serious letter.
Examples before affixes that start with
^ The ugit nounbases (those that end in an ugit affix such as matup, zatR, vatup, ktavatu,
Example.
The nounbases
as in
Before strong su, the
but the zatR-enders don't, because they are not udit --
Exception. Rootnouns do get num, even if they are ugit.
So, the root
, does not get num.
Exception to the exception. The root
pra + ac''' m + am
but before a non- strong --
pra + ac''' m + zas →
See also exception nAbhyastAcchatuH.
^ This yuj- rootnoun has kvin (by Rtvig;dadhRk) and means "joiner". Anomalously for a rootnoun, it can be used uncompounded.
yuj- + jas
Because of the kvin affix, rule kvinpra works here:
yuj- + su
^ By " num it! ", I mean "add
Examples --
Counterexample with a
Instead of quoting this rule properly as napuMsakasyajhalacaH , I nickname it "the nonfunny rule". I got into that habit to keep my students from saying "
^ Example --
This is the only rule that can make a TAsup behave differently after a masculine and after a neuter --
After adjectives, this
^ In other words, the previous rule is compulsory on normal nouns. But, on adjectives, it is still compulsory before zI, but optional before Ge Gasi Gas Gi os.
or, by this rule --
[ masculine-like ]
However, as
^ So the TAsup are the last twenty-one affixes of the list svaujas.
In other words, all the sup are TAsup except the first six, svWjas and amWTchaS.
^ (Exception to ikocivibhaktau, that would have added
The four neuter nounbases
Most of the time, alloponaH will erase the
When these are not neuter because they are at the end of a compound, the rule still works --
or
while your proposed rewording would forbid
chunk 37: 71027 yuSmad and asmad